Solovyov smashed Chubais after talking about bandits. Chubais and efficiency - on different sides What did Solovyov say about Chubais
Interesting not so much Chubais as social psychology.
He is an example of how it works.
V.V. Kvachkov, a brave general in the Uzbek army, sees fit to kill him.
No questions, it's a good thing. Just what next? Further, the general believes, the Chubais tribe will either get scared and run away, or get scared and return the loot. Both of these are for the good of the Russian people, even apart from money: they bring them closer to the Uzbek people and move them away from the European people. Fear, it is generally beneficial.
It would be good, but in order to implement such a strategic plan, you need to be able to connect a landmine to a battery.
Which is not given to every general.
On the other hand, it would be nice to more accurately assess the volume of the loot.
The Levada Center found that the population considers Chubais the second wealthiest person in Russia. After Abramovich, but ahead of Luzhkov. God knows what the basis of this ranking is. The people know how to see the truth with a special mystical eye - teaches A.A. Prokhanov. Although, in principle, there is an explanation: build a matrix of references in the media in the context of ownership - that's all mysticism.
In the Forbes rating, alien to mysticism, the modest Vladimir Lisin is in the first place with 15.8 billion dollars.
The people endowed with spiritual vision do not see him point-blank. Mikhail Prokhorov is second with $13.4 billion. R. Abramovich ($11.2 billion) is in fourth place, after M. Fridman, but ahead of Deripaska, Alekperov, Potanin, Mordashov, Rashnikov and Rybolovlev (fifth to tenth places).
Chubais is not on the list of billionaires.
Like Luzhkov. There is E. Baturina ($2.9 billion, 27th place). In addition, published official data on the family income of officials. The Luzhkov family earned 30,949 million rubles in a year, or about $1 billion. Of these, Yury Mikhailovich personally put $270,000 (7.98 million rubles) into a common bedside table. 0.03% of family income - as befits a pious mayor who cares not about the family, but about the good of good Muscovites.
Chubais and his family made 224.4 million rubles (about $7.2 million).
It's not poor either. However, 138 times less than Luzhkov, the most passionate critic of Chubais's privatization, the faithful guardian of sovereign interests, social justice and public property. Man and patriot.
It is interesting to see how information bagels are cooked, which smart people like Luzhkov feed brave people like Kvachkov.
He very successfully connected the recent power outages in the Central District with the reform of the electric power industry: "And it became clear that the liberal king Chubais is naked."
There is, however, one subtlety.
Outages occurred in the network economy. Which, as a sin, the Chubais reform bypassed. She left it in the hands of the state to the delight of the patriots Kvachkov and Luzhkov - as an element of strategic infrastructure. They privatized only the generation - and it generates quite well. Boilers are brewing with might and main - but strategic wires lay down. Although the smart state has included in the electricity tariffs expenses not only for the operation, but also for the development of networks. Who stole the deductions from a successful market industry, and why the state-owned network office was not ready for the winter - this should be asked not from Chubais, but from the Putin government. And the glorious Soviet experience.
Chubais can be smashed for the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydroelectric power station (by the way, built and put into operation exactly according to Soviet canons - like Chernobyl in its time).
But for the network - right, it is no longer worth it.
Why is the wise V.R. Solovyov is substituted like that?
I'm sure he's driven by noble motives. He sends a signal.
It is already clear to the population that Chubais is to blame.
We skip this. It is equally obvious to the authorities that the state management has screwed up again. It is also clear that V.R. Solovyov, an experienced showman with an established image and a solid clientele, just does not throw words into the wind. There are, of course, drain cisterns that work for the love of art or for the sake of cheap popularity, but this is not the case at all. Moreover, the text is riddled with serious pain for the fate of the technocrats squeezed out of life by Chubais: “After all, these people are telling the truth about changes in the industries in which they understand, and not what is politically true ... There is no system for growth and personnel search, everyone is filled with friends of friends - the main misfortune of our country since the beginning of perestroika ... The system of personnel training and their growth. The country is suffocating from personnel shortages…”.
That is, with the frankness of a Roman, the situation is described on TV, in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, in special services, in the dacha cooperative "Lake" and other state-forming structures.
Although, it would seem, what does Chubais have to do with it?
Summing up these simple considerations and taking into account such exploits of technocrats as the launch of GLONASS in the Pacific Ocean, another mu-mu with a fifth-generation fighter, the Sukhoi-100 super-jet and the sale of the elusive aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov, a reasonable person will make V.R. . Solovyov, the obvious conclusion is that Putin's brigade has already financed the pre-election raids.
In this case, Chubais. From simple, as the truth, soviet reasons: firstly, to divert attention from their own failures. Secondly, to destroy potential competitors, exposing them as enemies and pests. Thirdly, to fool, intimidate and mobilize the population.
With this archival warning, like a railroad worker who stained the brake light with personal blood, Mr. Sloviev runs ahead of the technocratic steam locomotive: “Attack! There will be a ride! The bubble is unmeasured!!”.
Elections, however.
"Technocrats" against "modernizers".
Thanks to Vladimir Rudolfovich for personal courage and contribution.
Now the people, at least, know what the halves will be called, into which the supreme Pull-Push will fall apart.
As for Chubais, after he dreamed that Putin would not run for president, a tough technocratic response was simply bound to follow.
But he also managed to support Nemtsov ...
What pleases is the stability.
But she's worried! Of course, Khodorkovsky-Lebedev, Nemtsov and Chubais, as enemies of the people, will not spoil the furrow. But even to the very depths of the mystical spirit they will no longer plow. We need something new, hotter. Like an underground passage from the Kremlin to Washington, or Al-Qaeda cells at the Ivanovo worsted knitting factory. Explosions of houses on Kashirka, war in the Caucasus. And better at the Manege ...
Work, comrades, think bolder.
The signal has been sent. Non-partisan technocrats with kind tired eyes, warm hearts and cold hands are waiting for proposals. It's only the beginning.
Solovyov supplied the published record with the words: "Sometimes it is better to be silent than to speak." In his opinion, the head of Rosnano did not know the country and its people. "But he taught and managed," the TV presenter wrote on his Twitter page.
ON THIS TOPIC
Solovyov's harsh words were provoked by an interview with Chubais's wife, Avdotya Smirnova, on RTVi. In it, in particular, they talked about the TV series "Brigada", which she showed her husband.
According to the director, "The Brigade" made a great impression on her husband. “He looked and said: “What an insane humiliation people experienced from the triumph of bandits. How humiliating and terrible it was," Smirnova said.
"Sometimes it's better to be silent than to speak" ... Everything you need to know about Chubais. Didn't know the country. How people lived did not know. But he taught and managed... pic.twitter.com/i1mrFLVgcA
— Vladimir Soloviev (@VRSoloviev) September 24, 2018
She also noted that Chubais knew about the dominance of crime in the 90s, but did not appreciate the impact of rampant banditry on compatriots. According to her, it is one thing to know that bandits exist and have great influence, and another thing is to see their behavior in everyday life. "Where was he supposed to see this? In the Russian government? Or in the RAO EU?" Smirnova asked.
Earlier, Anatoly Chubais was criticized for his production of his wife's new film "The Story of a Destination." The head of Rosnano himself said that he was not going to discuss this topic.
Recall that the 15-episode crime drama "Brigada" was released in 2002. The picture tells about the life path of four friends who united in a criminal group. The main roles were played by Sergey Bezrukov, Dmitry Dyuzhev, Pavel Maikov and Vladimir Vdovichenkov. Maykov, who played Pchela in the "Brigade", had previously been rather critical of the series, stating that it had done great harm to Russian society.
Published on 24.01.17 09:50TV presenter Vladimir Solovyov continued the dispute in absentia with the head of Rosnano Anatoly Chubais on the air of the program "Sunday Evening".
The well-known Russian TV presenter Vladimir Solovyov decided with the head of Rosnano Anatoly Chubais on the live TV show "Sunday Evening".
At the end of the program, Solovyov asked the guests for permission to "monopolize" the attention of the audience and recalled his discussion with Chubais on social networks. Responding to his opponent's comment that he was not very smart if he decided to invite Chubais to his TV show, the presenter burst into a stormy tirade, starting with the words: "Compared to you intcbatch we are all stupid."
So, the TV journalist reminded the head of Rosnano about the promise to give two "Volgas" for a privatization voucher, called him a man who easily survived the coup attempt and did not answer for "boxes from a photocopier", recalling the "surrender" of his comrades-in-arms during the "writer's business". Solovyov also attributed the blame to Chubais for the liquidation of the right-wing project in Russia and accused him of the collapse of the energy industry in our country.
“It was only you who said that the main result of Rosnano’s activities (well, at least for your employees) is that you have a lot of money. "Rain" to Ksenia Sobchak," the TV presenter said.
At the same time, Solovyov said that the issue of dismissing the head of the state corporation did not depend on him, but the journalist himself was ready to provide Chubais with airtime to defend his position. As a result, the TV presenter concluded that the head of Rosnano was simply afraid of an honest conversation in front of the audience.
“What is it? You don’t like the people? Are you afraid of the people’s opinion? Oh, of course, you will make us happy and, after generations, we will understand,” Solovyov added.
Vladimir Solovyov criticizes Anatoly Chubais. "Sunday evening". Last release 01/22/2017. VIDEO
Previously wrote about and Anatoly Chubais on Twitter.
The Fund for Digital Economy Projects under the control of Rosnano will appear in Russia. 20 billion rubles will be spent on the creation of the fund. Where does government money go? Leading "Vesti FM" - Vladimir Solovyov And Anna Shafran.
SOLOVIEV: Business representatives are skeptical about such an initiative.
SAFFRON: Can't be!
SOLOVIEV: As President of Opora Rossii Alexander Kalinin said, before creating a new fund, it is necessary to figure out how it will differ from existing ones. According to the Izvestiya newspaper, Rusnano has 7 investment funds with a total volume of more than 100 billion rubles. Anton Danilov-Danilyan, co-chairman of Delovaya Rossiya, expressed the opinion to the publication that in Russia the activities of a number of state institutions already cover the SME sector, and it might be worth decapitalizing one of the existing funds, rather than creating a new one. Yo Mama! Explain to me what is the effectiveness of Chubais, if all the checking structures each time said that it was not as effective as we would like. Plus, every time criminal cases are initiated, and then disappears somewhere. The only operation that Chubais brilliantly pulled off, as Oleg Lurie brilliantly described, was the colossal cost of the land plots he acquired in Zherebtsovo-Khrenovo, which suddenly began to rise sharply in price. In addition to this scam, what else is Chubais famous for? How? Destruction, in my opinion, of our energy? What is going on? You tell me, a country where everything is on tenders, what, this money is allocated as a result of some kind of tender? Have you ever heard anything that Rosnano and Chubais were experts in the field of artificial intelligence and various new technologies. For example, there is such a company called Yandex and Arkady Volozh, so he understands exactly what he is talking about. There are development guys, they work closely, in particular, with Sberbank. These people understand exactly what is at stake, as evidenced by the creation of a brilliant school, the idea of which was brought from Paris ... I don’t remember, some number. What's next? What's next for us? Who among us understands this, is deeply versed in big data, in all matters, artificial intelligence? Mikhail Vladimirovich Mishustin. Fine. Next, who do we know? Miss Kaspersky. No?
SAFFRON: Kaspersky, Ashmanov, there are people who understand.
SOLOVIEV: Is the surname Chubais listed there? Where did Rosnano Chubais come from, why do they claim this money? What, was there a tender somewhere? That is, it is enough to write, slyly smuggle a letter to Oreshkin and state grandmothers are sent to those who do not understand anything about this. Besides, what will they do? They supposedly will distribute. Are they able to distribute effectively? Many times Yevgeny Yanovich Satanovsky has already said everything he thinks about the efficiency of the work and the selection of these very Chubaisyats. There is no such stupidity either in China or in America. It's just unique. That is, Chubais says: I will be a pad for use ...
Listen in full on the audio file.
